Skilled: Keith Wynn, 45, was experienced and capable of the job
An electronics company has been ordered to pay compensation to an East Molesey man who was denied a job interview because he is deaf.
In a scathing judgment, South London Employment Tribunal said Woking-based Multipulse Electronics' decision to cancel an interview with 45-year-old Keith Wynn was "founded on the worst type of stereotypical assumptions".
Mr Wynn, 45, who worked in a similar role for 25 years at another company, was told his interview was cancelled because the company had not organised a sign language interpreter.
He sought legal advice after failed attempts to have his interview rescheduled, and was told by Multipulse Electronics that a company of its size gave instructions orally and could not employ a specialist interpreter.
At the tribunal in October last year, Multipulse's company secretary Mr P Scott noted that Mr Wynn's skills and abilities were not an issue.
He also admitted to not asking Mr Wynn, nor making any inquiries generally, about whether additional resources would be necessary.
advertisement
The tribunal concluded that Mr Wynn was less favourably treated on the grounds of his disability and that only very slight adjustments would have needed to be made to accommodate him.
It said all the company's actions "were predicated on ignorant, erroneous, stereotypical assumptions of Mr Wynn's abilities".
Mr Wynn said: "I was deeply upset and depressed by Multipulse Electronics' decision to deny me an opportunity to secure employment because of my disability.
"It is indeed unfortunate when experienced and capable individuals are not given the chance to make a contribution to the workplace."
Posted by: Fintan, North Yorkshire on 8:04pm Fri 25 Jan 08
He is lucky to be considered a interview as most deaf people never get this far.
Most of us do not put deaf in application form as it would have been rejected if we did.
He is lucky to be considered a interview as most deaf people never get this far.
Most of us do not put deaf in application form as it would have been rejected if we did.
Posted by: Tim, North Wales on 8:41pm Fri 25 Jan 08
This case shows why the Welfare Reform is so unfair.
It is not that disabled people don't want to work, but rather that employers don't want to take us on.
Yet disabled people are the ones being threatened with sanctions!
This case shows why the Welfare Reform is so unfair.
It is not that disabled people don't want to work, but rather that employers don't want to take us on.
Yet disabled people are the ones being threatened with sanctions!
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
Print
Email this
Comment
