Health bosses recommend St Helier Hospital lose its A&E and maternity

Health bosses recommend St Helier Hospital lose its A&E and maternity

Health bosses recommend St Helier Hospital lose its A&E and maternity

First published in Save St Helier Wimbledon Guardian: Photograph of the Author by , Chief Reporter

Healthcare bosses have put St Helier Hospital one step closer to losing its vital services.

At a meeting this afternoon, the programme board of the Better Services Better Value review put forward their preferred model for the future shape of health services in SW London.

They have recommended St Helier Hospital lose its accident and emergency and maternity departments.

Under the recommendations St Helier will retain a stand-alone urgent care centre which could treat up to half of current A&E patients.

They have also proposed a planned care centre at St Helier Hospital for non-emergency surgery for patients across south west London.

The programme board recommended changes to children’s care in SW London with the sickest children and those requiring a longer hospital stay being sent to St George’s Hospital in Tooting.

Their recommendations will be considered by the joint boards the SW London Primary Care Trusts on Thursday, September 27.

If they accept the recommendation – it is expected to go to public consultation from October 1.

Dr Howard Freeman, local GP and joint medical director for Better Services Better Value, said:  “After a careful and considered deliberative process, these are our recommendations. No final decisions have been made. Our proposals will be subject to NHS London and Joint Boards approval and, if they get that, to full public consultation.”

Dr David Finch, local GP and joint medical director for Better Services Better Value, said:
“Whilst as a GP I am excited by the huge potential of the BSBV programme for saving lives and improving patient care, it is important to recognise that some people will be anxious about our proposals.

“I want to reassure those people that over 100 doctors, nurses and other health professionals have been involved in this programme and that we believe these changes will have huge clinical benefits for patients.

“I know that some people are worried that they may have to travel further for care. But treatment begins in the ambulance and the evidence strongly suggests that putting all of the best specialists in fewer units is much safer for patients.

"Travel times are important, but it’s much more important that you get to the right specialist team with the right equipment, even if that means a slightly longer journey.”

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

7:27pm Wed 29 Aug 12

emmas85 says...

congratulations - you have taken one step closer to making this more of a financial matter rather than thinking of the patients and/or those who need medical attention
congratulations - you have taken one step closer to making this more of a financial matter rather than thinking of the patients and/or those who need medical attention emmas85
  • Score: 0

7:28pm Wed 29 Aug 12

Whatyousaying says...

There is no way st heiler can lose it's a&e and maternity department I had all 3 of my children here and the care I recived on the birthing ward was fantastic I have also had to use the a&e department many times and it is really handy having it only a 5 min drive away where would I go I I needed urgent care??? Cause I certainly wouldn't go to croydon im backing st helier all the way SOS
There is no way st heiler can lose it's a&e and maternity department I had all 3 of my children here and the care I recived on the birthing ward was fantastic I have also had to use the a&e department many times and it is really handy having it only a 5 min drive away where would I go I I needed urgent care??? Cause I certainly wouldn't go to croydon im backing st helier all the way SOS Whatyousaying
  • Score: 0

12:38am Thu 30 Aug 12

jansthelier says...

Rubbish rubbish rubbish, we all know it is about money and not services, don't insult us. Hmmm, let me see 5 mins in the ambulance and then straight into the place where they have all the equipment or 30 mins in the ambulance if your lucky. Let me see I like 5 mins in the ambulance and I like 30 mins in the ambulance but which is best, there's only one way to find out....... but it might just be too late for you and your family.
Rubbish rubbish rubbish, we all know it is about money and not services, don't insult us. Hmmm, let me see 5 mins in the ambulance and then straight into the place where they have all the equipment or 30 mins in the ambulance if your lucky. Let me see I like 5 mins in the ambulance and I like 30 mins in the ambulance but which is best, there's only one way to find out....... but it might just be too late for you and your family. jansthelier
  • Score: 0

7:42pm Sat 8 Sep 12

LanceD says...

How do the people 'in charge' think of these names - 'Better Services Better Value'?
Straight away, you know the service will be worse and probably cost us more! Not many days of a true 'National' Health Service left - Thanks, Lansley and Camoron!
How do the people 'in charge' think of these names - 'Better Services Better Value'? Straight away, you know the service will be worse and probably cost us more! Not many days of a true 'National' Health Service left - Thanks, Lansley and Camoron! LanceD
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree