Date set for South London Incinerator High Court showdown

Wimbledon Guardian: Shasha Khan Shasha Khan

A date has been set for a High Court hearing that will decide the fate of plans to build a controversial incinerator on a nature reserve.

Sutton Council and London mayor Boris Johnson gave the go-ahead to plans to build an energy recovery facility on land off Lane last year.

But the plans have met opposition from environmental campaigner Shasha Khan who has secured a court hearing, known as a judicial review, that will decide whether the decision to grant planning permission was correct.

The judicial review will take place at the Royal Courts of Justice on October 9 and 10 and will explore whether Sutton Council's decision to sign a contract with incinerator developer Viridor prior to planning permission being granted affected its decision.

Wimbledon Guardian: How the proposed incinerator could look by night

How the incinerator will look at night

The process is not cheap and Mr Khan and his legal team, led by Ed Miliband's wife Justine Thornton, estimate the cost of getting the case to court and the resulting hearing will be over £22,000.

Mr Khan said: "Naturally, I am feeling anxious about how much is needed, but new donations are coming in daily through the crowd funding site, bank transfers and cheques so I am hopeful the money can be raised. 

"Many thought the campaign couldn’t get this far, but there is a belief that justice is on the side of the people, especially when High Court judge Mr Justice Collins, when granting permission, observed that the possible conflict of interest for Sutton Council, "is all too obvious".

"By the same token, it is important the campaign is not priced out of justice.

"I hope people will continue donate and join me and fellow Stop The Incinerator campaigners outside the Royal Courts in early October."

Donations can be made via stoptheincinerator.co.uk and cheques payable to Mr S.I Khan can be sent to Stop the Incinerator, c/o 97 Priory Road, Croydon, CR0 3QZ.

Comments (6)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:55pm Thu 17 Jul 14

Niki R says...

Good luck Shasha, you carry a wight many could not imagine bearing. I am proud to have donated and to have protested against this and am in awe of your commitment to the fight for public health to be placed before profits.
Good luck Shasha, you carry a wight many could not imagine bearing. I am proud to have donated and to have protested against this and am in awe of your commitment to the fight for public health to be placed before profits. Niki R
  • Score: 10

2:06pm Thu 17 Jul 14

alroutemaster says...

Not just public health at stake here, if the site is a nature reserve the health of the wildlife is also at risk.
Not just public health at stake here, if the site is a nature reserve the health of the wildlife is also at risk. alroutemaster
  • Score: 6

2:50pm Thu 17 Jul 14

Norm's Mum says...

Thank you and good luck, my donation is on it's way.
Thank you and good luck, my donation is on it's way. Norm's Mum
  • Score: 6

7:30pm Thu 17 Jul 14

mercury5 says...

Of course several thousand tons of soil seeping landfill is sooooo much better! .....Luddites.
Of course several thousand tons of soil seeping landfill is sooooo much better! .....Luddites. mercury5
  • Score: -5

9:48pm Thu 17 Jul 14

D Hoole says...

mercury5 wrote:
Of course several thousand tons of soil seeping landfill is sooooo much better! .....Luddites.
You think a 25 year bonfire is an intelligent, modern solution to waste disposal? Luddite does spring to mind.
Try a search for 'incineration alternatives'. You will find methods such as Autoclaving, Plasma gasification, Mechanical and biological treatment.
Another objection is simply that much of this 'waste' is in fact unsorted recycling (and a bit of contaminated recycling from Luddite residents) - the four boroughs of the South London Waste Partnership shouldn't be giving up on raising their recycling rates at this time.
[quote][p][bold]mercury5[/bold] wrote: Of course several thousand tons of soil seeping landfill is sooooo much better! .....Luddites.[/p][/quote]You think a 25 year bonfire is an intelligent, modern solution to waste disposal? Luddite does spring to mind. Try a search for 'incineration alternatives'. You will find methods such as Autoclaving, Plasma gasification, Mechanical and biological treatment. Another objection is simply that much of this 'waste' is in fact unsorted recycling (and a bit of contaminated recycling from Luddite residents) - the four boroughs of the South London Waste Partnership shouldn't be giving up on raising their recycling rates at this time. D Hoole
  • Score: 7

12:25pm Fri 18 Jul 14

Mr Strings says...

Surely common sense suggests you should never see "nature reserve" and "incinerator" in the same sentence.
Surely common sense suggests you should never see "nature reserve" and "incinerator" in the same sentence. Mr Strings
  • Score: 6
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree