Merton Council launches consultation into borough-wide controlled drinking zone

Merton police would be able to stop you drinking alcohol in public Merton police would be able to stop you drinking alcohol in public

Police will be given new powers to stop people drinking in the street anywhere in Merton under a new by-law.

Today, Merton Council launched a formal consultation into a borough-wide controlled drinking zone (CDZ), currently in force in Mitcham and Wimbledon town centre.

A CDZ allows the police to confiscate alcohol at their discretion in a bid to curb anti-social behaviour caused by street drinking.

Councillor David Simpson, Merton Conservatives’ crime prevention spokesman, welcomed the proposals after they were unanimously recommended by members of the council’s licensing committee in November 2012.

Coun Simpson said: “The Labour council has been unwilling to listen to residents who have problems with street drinking in areas such as south Wimbledon, Colliers Wood and Morden.

In November, council leader Stephen Alambritis said it would be simpler and more cost-effective to have a single CDZ rather than to keep consulting Wimbledon and Mitcham residents separately.

He said: "By going borough wide we will be offering residents what is already on offer in Islington, Newham, Brent and Camden."

The cost of implementing and consulting on the proposed CDZ has been estimated at between £20,000 to £30,000.

The consultation ends on April 1 and can be viewed online at consult.merton.gov.uk.


Do you support a borough-wide controlled drinking zone? Leave a comment below, tweet @WimbledonNews or email: newsdesk@wimbledonguardian.co.uk.


Comments(3)

tjames says...
8:14pm Fri 1 Mar 13

a total waste of our money

AdamJacobs says...
9:07pm Mon 4 Mar 13

Is this even legal? According to S13(2) of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 (which is what Merton Council believes give them the power to do this):

"A local authority may for the purposes of subsection (1) by order identify any public place in their area if they are satisfied that—

(a)nuisance or annoyance to members of the public or a section of the public; or

(b)disorder;

has been associated with the consumption of alcohol in that place."

Surely they can't claim that's true of the entire borough?

tjames says...
6:27am Tue 5 Mar 13

i agree

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree